As many retail, manufacturing, logistics, service providers, and distribution organizations continue to grow and diversify their product portfolios or supply chains there is an ever growing need to allow companies to more seamlessly integrate their platforms with their data providers and subsequent supply chain networks. Informatica’s Supplier 360 (S360) platform, part of the Master Data Management (MDM) suite, helps customers achieve these very objectives. The ability for an organization to provide its network of suppliers with an easy and efficient means to self-register, become an approved vendor and begin to supply their products to a prospective organization is imperative in such a competitive marketplace. Each organization requires an ability to onboard suppliers in an expeditious manner and reduce time to market for products, while reducing the overhead costs of onboarding individual suppliers and allowing for greater data governance of the data submitted by these suppliers. Organizations increasingly have a need to manage supplier relationships, whether parent / subsidiary relations, primary / secondary / tertiary supplier relations, or supplier to broker relations, as well as supplier to product relationships. All of these critical goals can be achieved leveraging S360 and the MDM suite.
Prior to kicking off the actual S360 implementation it is beneficial for an organization’s key business stakeholders to prepare, plan, strategize, compile, and consolidate their key critical business objectives and requirements. This can be further enhanced via the adoption of a readiness assessment, which allows for the various relevant topical business use cases or user stories to be discussed in a round table setting where the essential business and IT stakeholders can align on key objectives, critical business pain points that require resolution, and ensure that areas where further due diligence is required are noted. As a result, action plans should be developed to ensure critical organizational feedback from various departments is captured to ensure the success of the future S360 implementation.
Once an organization has determined it is ready to kick off its Supplier 360 MDM implementation there are numerous project aspects to understand, plan and execute to ensure a timely and successful rollout of the S360 platform. Many of these critical project implementation factors are described below.
As part of the pre-project planning, it is essential to understand the various mandatory and option project roles that will be required throughout the project and during various critical stages of the project. It is equally critical to understand, create and follow a project RASCI matrix which will highlight the various project resources who should be involved in these activities for at least one of the following categories: Responsible, Accountable, Supported, Consulted or Informed of each of the key project activities and/or major tasks.
While not comprehensive, below is a depiction example of some of the key essential project roles for a successful S360 roll out:
During the early stages of the project the review and discussion of the information compiled during the pre-kickoff business preparedness and readiness assessment sessions will prove invaluable. The project team working with the organization’s key business and IT stakeholders can collaboratively discuss the previously identified business pain points and noted business needs. The project’s business analysts and solution architects can work together to facilitate and author the functional requirements from these workshop sessions. These Discovery review sessions with the stakeholders should culminate in a series of documented project artifacts that convey the following:
The next step is to transpose the functional business requirements to solution design and system and platform requirements.
During the iterative Discovery sessions, the project will segue from analysis-laden activities to more in-depth design and more detailed solution-based activities. Some of the key activities and topical design areas as part of the solution design will include the following key topical functional areas of focus:
The build and test phase are typically performed in lower level environments to construct and validate the configurations, customizations, extensions, and integration of Supplier 360 with the rest of the enterprise. This includes testing inbound and outbound data feeds per pre-defined SLAs from the Discovery and Design sessions. Performance tuning testing is recommended to isolate any systems or defined business process bottlenecks before they can impact schedule.
It can significantly reduce risk to perform dry runs of deployment and IDL in the production domain, using proxies for integrating systems (good backup/restore SOPs can make this much more efficient). Standard SDLC best practices combined with Data Governance can significantly reduce risk in this phase.
Typical Build & Test Activities:
During the early stages of the project, the Project Management leads should work with the business stakeholders to ensure that appropriate training leads or train the trainers are identified whether that is locally, regionally, or globally. The project management team and senior stakeholders should be aware that training may take on several forms such as instructor-led or onDemand video, along with documented training visual aids. It is very often the case that the key training leads first take some form of core or foundational product training in preparation for their being able to prepare training collateral that may be more specific to their own organization’s Supplier 360 solution.
One of the most critically important aspects of a successful Supplier 360 rollout is the preparation of a comprehensive supplier onboarding strategy. Planning supplier onboarding will involve the creation of training content. Some of this content will be in the form of recorded video tutorials and the uploading of documents and templates for suppliers to review and use. During the Supplier 360 project this content should be authored and reviewed on an iterative business by the project stakeholders. Additionally, supplier templates for data ingestion will need to be defined and approved. While there are a variety of approaches to take when identifying these supplier templates (e.g., vendor long form, vendor short form, vendor pricing updates form, etc.) they could be defined generically or by channel, region, etc.
Leading up to a successful Go-Live there are some additional considerations to factor, one of which is whether there will be a beta or pilot release to a small percentage of identified suppliers. Informatica recommends that a cross-section of suppliers always be leveraged for any beta or pilot rollout so that feedback comes back to the organization from large scale, mid-size, and smaller more localized suppliers to ensure a full spectrum of supplier feedback is received. What is an issue for a larger supplier (e.g., outsourced brokers providing subsets of the supplier’s data) may or may not be an issue for the smaller scale supplier (e.g., less IT capacity). Suppliers from different industry verticals should also be considered during the planning phases. Again as an example, a dairy supplier, meat vendor, apparel vendor and general merchandise supplier will not all interact or be providing the same information or be required to provide the same industry certifications in order to be successfully approved as part of their self-registration process.
Lastly, it is imperative that the supplier onboarding plan aligns with the business’s desired timetable where feasible and practical. Assessing and managing the expectations of the business stakeholders and ensuring alignment on the go forward strategy for onboarding the full network of suppliers is essential regardless of the total volume of suppliers. No matter the size of the organization’s supplier network, the onboarding strategy must be practical and feasible to execute successfully. Factoring in the incremental rollout to its network of suppliers is essential for the organization. A big-bang rollout is generally ill advised, whereas an incremental rollout allowing for greater feedback directly from the suppliers in the early iterations will ensure the business can quickly implement feedback and pivot on any desired changes to the supplier onboarding process prior to ramping up to larger volumes of suppliers being onboarded.
As the project approaches successful business stakeholder acceptance (via User Acceptance Testing), the Project Manager and Delivery leads can commence the execution of the previously reviewed cutover and Go-Live plan. This will include ensuring production environment and infrastructure is in place, the data migration of source system data has been ingested into Supplier 360’s MDM environment, verification of the final deployments and approved configurations, smoke test verifications ensuring integrations will work once the “switch is flipped”, and that systems scheduled for decommissioning or sunsetting are taken offline where applicable.
RESOURCES
360 Engagement
PLAN
IMPLEMENT
MONITOR
OPTIMIZE