Following a rigorous methodology is key to delivering customer satisfaction and expanding analytics use cases across the business.
In the Program & Change Management overview, we discussed why a formal approach to change management is important.
Undertaking a formal Change Management Program needs to be a deliberate and staged process.
We’ve simplified these steps into four basic stages that include:
In this article, we will discuss best practices for conducting a thorough change management assessment.
Regardless of size, organizations typically are complex. The reason for this is that most enterprises have grown over time to deliver products and services to a targeted set of consumers or clients (could be customers, members, patients, etc.). As organizations evolve and grow they develop pockets of expertise and supporting technologies designed to facilitate and sometimes automate daily business operations and administration. Over time this results in ‘fiefdoms’ of control and expertise, as well as ‘silos’ of applications, data definitions, information, and users.
When we want to change acculturated operations or management, whether it be focused on data management or auxiliary business interrelationships that support sharing and support of understanding, this can introduce threats to the existing culture around day-to-day expectations. What happens to the accumulated expertise? How disruptive will the change be to myself, my team, and others? While the reasons for introducing change may be laudable—improving operational efficiency, upgrading to new technologies, modifying organizational structure to consolidate and integrate expertise—it also introduces uncertainty. This uncertainty needs to be understood, addressed, and deliberately managed to smooth the journey from ‘old’ to ‘new’.
Any type of new program, whether it be Data Governance, Data Strategy or another kind of strategic initiative will need to be elevated to the broader enterprise in regard to:
Clearly, the priority when undertaking a change initiative needs to be achieving maximum transparency with colleagues. The first step in this larger process is to understand the sources of concern (or other) within the organization, and potential reasons for resistance.
Once the rationale for introducing change has been thoroughly explained to members of the organization, an assessment should be designed to take into consideration opinions of multiple types of employees. This audience should be as broad and comprehensive as possible.
The assessment should take all these types of opinions into account and thus should be administered broadly to get a comprehensive picture of perceptions.
When beginning to design the assessment, consider the change itself. Is this a new department with responsibilities that are new? Is this a change in technology that will deliver goods, services, or data in a new way? Is this a new type of role that will disrupt existing relationships or power structures? For each type of change that is being introduced, ensure that questions cover the direct and indirect—or merely perceived impact—of the change.
Also consider the 5 key dimensions of the organization. These can be categorized (for any type of change) into the following:
The end-result of the assessment will enable categorization and quantification metrics based upon these organizational categories (both as baseline metrics and as target achievement metrics). These results will help to guide in the design of an implementation plan as well as in developing a roadmap for sustained success of the change.
Sample types of questions to potentially design into the assessment include:
Depending upon the type of change being introduced, the questions will necessarily be different. Try to be creative and open-minded when designing an assessment survey. This tool will help capture important information that will be relevant in the next stage of the Change Management process - Program Design.
Success
Link Copied to Clipboard